UPDATED RAIDEN SHOGUN GUIDE! Best Raiden Build - Artifacts, Weapons & Showcase | Genshin Impact

SNY

2023-03-27 16:33:48

when diluc guide?

Sri Raghuram

2023-03-26 14:32:40

Hi Zy0x so this is not about raiden but if i have 2pc glad and shin will i get 36% atk bonus?

RP

2023-03-23 15:19:26

God i really hate how it's called "Elemental Skill" and "Elemental Burst" I always get so confused. Why isn't it called Elemental Skill and Ultimate or something. Even "Skill" and "Burst" would have been better. Why did they use the same word twice

gzemme

2023-03-23 09:56:04

Is thundering fury good on her?

Asumi _Channn

2023-03-16 17:40:56

I came here because I made a showcase and posted it on Reddit (bad idea) it was my first time ever posting a showcase and I wanted to join in on the fun thinking that soloing storm terror and cyno flower was something to brag about to my surprise, THEY DRUG ME THROUGH THE MUD saying I don’t deserve raiden and there are plenty of people who wanted her durning her rerun and didn’t get her and they would’ve treaded her better or something and called me stupid and dm and saying random insults in the comments. She’s c3 with engulfing lighting and apparently she’s supposed to be able to solo Ei (boss) and stuff and my friends IRL agreed with the comments so now I’m here to mean how to build her since mine is considered dog water

R D

2023-03-10 21:21:30

Ah I see so my problem is no money to spend on resin and fates whenever the banner next rolls around. At least waiting can solve it?
No Kazuha moment

tanmigz19

2023-03-08 00:16:31

Is it VALID to use Primordial Jade spear when my ER is 200+ ??

DefinitelyMaxx

2023-03-02 23:56:44

I ruined my build i made the normal attack to lvl5

james muhuhu

2023-02-27 17:53:00

Am wondering is it worth losing the energy recharge on The Catch for the Staff of Homa ... cause 45% energy recharge is quite alot for Raiden especially cause she also scales off it

Kuma_Nikko

2023-02-27 04:29:46

playing raiden (c1) with sara (c3) xiangling (c0) and yaoyao (c0) it's ok?

Rmili

2023-02-24 17:55:46

Raiden shogun is everything Zhongli should have been.

Juz Calm

2023-02-18 23:56:44

How about raiden/kujou/bennet(buff) /jean(anemo healer)... Is it possible to use

Lisa Mie

2023-02-18 19:08:31

im sorry but at the start he had no mora! like me! lmaooo

Immortes

2023-02-14 04:32:27

Do you feel like Yanfei and raiden Shogun synergize well, along with Xinqiu?

Utsav Agrawal

2023-02-04 05:33:01

My raiden have so much energy my god her energy regains before the burst have completed

DarkxAuraz

2023-02-04 03:53:32

lets just take a moment to realize that bro has never lost a polearm 50/50

DarkxAuraz

2023-02-04 03:39:43

i stacked so much energy recharge on raiden so she has 300 lmaooo

Smilyy

2023-02-02 19:49:36

If my Xiangling and Xingqiu both having 200ER+ is it enought on Raiden to be 180ER? I know she is scaling with ER but i don't have any good sands with ER on her

Tok Ash

2023-01-29 21:57:44

Thanks for this in-depth analysis and explanation of Raiden. Even though you posted this almost a year ago it is still relevant for me since I just acquired her in the last banner run and it has really helped me optimize my build for her. You talk pretty fast and edit your phrases very close to each other because I assume you're trying to fit as much content in the least amount of time as possible. So I watched this video fully through at least 3 times and then other segments, such as the artifacts section, multiple times.

On a side note unrelated to the subject, I notice you love saying the phrase "...with that said". I didn't notice it much at first but after hearing it so many times throughout the video and watching it repeatedly it started to get on my nerves. It's because this phrase has become so over-used and abused in social media now and the tragedy is that it is so unnecessary to say. We know you said it. Why are you telling me you said it? It's almost insulting my intelligence. If you try saying the sentences before and after while omitting this phrase you'll find the sentence and logic flow is absolutely fine without it and no meaning is lost in the change.

To prove my point on the frequency, while I was watching a re-run of the video to get more information, I also documented the time-stamps where you say this phrase or a variation of this phrase:

t56BLyPn9eM&t=00m47s 00:47 "with that being said..."
t56BLyPn9eM&t=04m56s 04:56 "with that said..."
t56BLyPn9eM&t=05m21s 05:21 "that being said..."
t56BLyPn9eM&t=06m43s 06:43 "now that said..."
t56BLyPn9eM&t=07m44s 07:44 "with that said..."
t56BLyPn9eM&t=10m45s 10:45 "now with that being said..."
t56BLyPn9eM&t=11m47s 11:47 "that being said..."
t56BLyPn9eM&t=12m35s 12:35 "with that said..."
t56BLyPn9eM&t=13m46s 13:46 "that being said..."
t56BLyPn9eM&t=14m35s 14:35 "with that said..."
t56BLyPn9eM&t=20m07s 20:07 "that being said..."
t56BLyPn9eM&t=20m49s 20:49 "with that being said..."
t56BLyPn9eM&t=23m48s 23:48 "with that being said..."

With all that being said (haha!), I don't have a problem if this phrase is used sparingly here and there. Because it actually boils down to it being my problem for being annoyed and not yours. I'm just pointing it out as it's something that I'm hoping content creators can be more cognizant about as it's us content consumers that have to listen to such an unnecessary phrase over and over...